3.0
The Duel
ByPublisher Description
First published in 1891, this morality tale pits a scientist, a government worker, his mistress, a deacon, and a physician against one another in a verbal battle of wits and ethics that explodes into a violent contest: the duel. When Laevsky, a lazy youth who works for the government, tires of his dependent mistress, Nadyezhda Fyodorovna, Von Koren, the scientist, delivers a scathing critique of Loevsky’s egotism, forcing the young man to examine his soul. The Duel is a tale of human weakness, the possibility of forgiveness, and a man’s ultimate ability to change his ways. It is classic Chekhov, revealing the multifaceted essence of human nature.
Download the free Fable app

Stay organized
Keep track of what you’re reading, what you’ve finished, and what’s next.
Build a better TBR
Swipe, skip, and save with our smart list-building tool
Rate and review
Share your take with other readers with half stars, emojis, and tags
Curate your feed
Meet readers like you in the Fable For You feed, designed to build bookish communitiesThe Duel Reviews
3.0
“🍂𝑺𝒐 𝒊𝒕 𝒊𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒆.... 𝑰𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒉 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝒎𝒂𝒏 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒘𝒐 𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒑𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒘𝒂𝒓𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒑 𝒃𝒂𝒄𝒌. 𝑺𝒖𝒇𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈, 𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒌𝒆𝒔, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒘𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒎 𝒃𝒂𝒄𝒌, 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒃𝒃𝒐𝒓𝒏 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒅𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒎 𝒐𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒏.🍂
The Duel by chekhov is a tale of morality, hypocrisy, and human weakness. Laevsky and Von Koren stand at the center of the story, two men with completely opposite views on life. Their duel begins as an ideological & philosophical one but eventually manifests in a literal duel. By the end both emerge as changed men, not necessarily wiser or purer but more human.
Another important character in the novella is Nadyezhda Fyodorovna, Laevsky’s lover. Deeply flawed, she mirrors his own moral confusion. Their relationship is filled with guilt and self-doubt, but eventually they accept each other.
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴, 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘴, 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘥𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴.
Throughout the book, Chekhov weaves conversations on literature, philosophy, science, and religion. Laevsky is a man of books and ideas, drawn to intellectualism but fails to act on it, he's quite confused and indecisive.
𝘔𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘏𝘢𝘮𝘭𝘦𝘵," 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘓𝘢𝘦𝘷𝘴𝘬𝘺 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺. "𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘺 𝘚𝘩𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘵! 𝘈𝘩, 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘺!"
Von Koren, on the other hand, is a zoologist, rational and cold, guided by his scientific convictions. He is a scientific idealist and believes weak and morally corrupt people like Laevsky are like parasites and should be eliminated from society. He thinks Laevsky is a superfluous man and has been influenced by the nihilistic ideology and, he believes this philosophy is dangerous for the society.
𝘞𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦....' 𝘖𝘳 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘖𝘯𝘺𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘯, 𝘗𝘦𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘯, 𝘉𝘺𝘳𝘰𝘯'𝘴 𝘊𝘢𝘪𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘉𝘢𝘻𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘷, 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘮 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘺: '𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘵.'
𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘬, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘖𝘯𝘺𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘯, 𝘗𝘦𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘛𝘶𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘷, 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯, 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘵.
This is quite ironic for Von Koren, despite being a Christian he lets hatred and arrogance seep in and gets ready to have a duel with Laevsky. This makes his character morally flawed. He's intelligent but he lacks empathy. The duel in the end signifies these characteristics in both the characters. In the end none of them have moral superiority over each other and thus the main theme of the book that's moral ambiguity is enacted.
Some Quotes I liked:
🔸"𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴' 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 "
🔸𝘛𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘛𝘰𝘭𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘶𝘱 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘴.
🔸𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘪𝘵.
🔸𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘐 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘺𝘰𝘶, 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘴𝘢𝘭𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘐 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘐 𝘥𝘰. 𝘐'𝘮 𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘺 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘥 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦'𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 .
🔸𝘔𝘺 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘺; 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦'𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘺 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵, 𝘢 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴.... 𝘐 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘳𝘶𝘯 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘺.
🔸𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘮𝘰𝘬𝘺 𝘭𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘤 𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥, 𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦, 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘴𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘺.
🔸𝘐 𝘢𝘮 𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘶𝘳𝘦, 𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯'
🔸𝘓𝘢𝘦𝘷𝘴𝘬𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘭: 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺, 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺; 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥-𝘸𝘪𝘥𝘦, 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭; 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱 𝘢 𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘱 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘓𝘢𝘦𝘷𝘴𝘬𝘺, 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘨𝘦, 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴, 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘰 𝘰𝘯
🔸𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘍𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘵, 𝘥𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘦?-𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘛𝘰𝘭𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘺.... 𝘈𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘚𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘢𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘚𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳, 𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘰𝘺𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘱𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘺: '𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘢𝘺, 𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘚𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳?
🔸𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘴.
🔸𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘰𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴. 𝘙𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘰 𝘪𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘶𝘴."
🔸𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦? 𝘐𝘭𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘮𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 .
🔸𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘦 𝘨𝘰 𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘪𝘧𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘏𝘪𝘮, 𝘴𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘶𝘴.
🔸𝘖𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘺 𝘎𝘰𝘥; 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦.”
“moest voor nederlands en daarna gingen we dan een toneel erover zien, ik vond da echt een vreemd boek haha en gwn nie echt mijn ding”
Start a Book Club
Start a public or private book club with this book on the Fable app today!FAQ
Do I have to buy the ebook to participate in a book club?
Why can’t I buy the ebook on the app?
How is Fable’s reader different from Kindle?
Do you sell physical books too?
Are book clubs free to join on Fable?
How do I start a book club with this book on Fable?

